<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; twitter growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/tag/twitter-growth/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter grows and grows</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/twitter-grows-and-grows.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=twitter-grows-and-grows</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/twitter-grows-and-grows.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dirkthecow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter growth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To say the least there&#8217;s been a certain amount of hype around the micro-blogging platform Twitter over the past year, and two stats by Internet metrics firm Hitwise show that the hype has indeed been matched by the numbers. Something that&#8217;s been fairly well reported is analyst Heather Dougherty&#8217;s post that Twitter has now passed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_02f24nJ8yic/SXgeFfnSEPI/AAAAAAAABK0/70ZYaiH9BnU/s1600-h/Twitter_UK_traffic_grwoth_2008_2009_chart.png" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5294014441708458226" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 325px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_02f24nJ8yic/SXgeFfnSEPI/AAAAAAAABK0/70ZYaiH9BnU/s400/Twitter_UK_traffic_grwoth_2008_2009_chart.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>To say the least there&#8217;s been a certain amount of hype around the micro-blogging platform Twitter over the past year, and two stats by Internet metrics firm <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/">Hitwise</a> show that the hype has indeed been matched by the numbers.</p>
<p>Something that&#8217;s been fairly well reported is analyst <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/">Heather Dougherty&#8217;s post</a> that <a href="http://www.twitter.com/dirkthecow">Twitter</a> has now passed the social tagging system <a href="http://www.digg.com/">Digg</a> in the US in terms of reach.</p>
<p>Heather&#8217;s fellow analyst Robin Goad has now <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2009/01/twitter_traffic_up_10-fold.html">produced a chart</a> that shows Twitter growing by a whopping 974% here in the UK (see chart) over the past year.     Robin says that his numbers are if anything an underestimate as it doesn&#8217;t take into account the fact that more and more people now access Twitter via 3rd party applications like <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/">Tweetdeck</a>.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Polish social network no 6 in the UK</span></p>
<p>At the same time it&#8217;s worth injecting a dose of reality into the statistics.    No doubt, Twitter&#8217;s growth is extremely impressive and shows no signs of slowing down.   And it&#8217;s something brands should be increasingly paying attention to, especially as Hitwise&#8217;s figures show that Twitter brings a lot of traffic to websites (news sites in particular).</p>
<p>Yet in the UK it&#8217;s currently still only no.23 in social networks, with <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> remaining the run-away leader, accounting for just under 5% of all web traffic at Christmas.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve posted before, <a href="http://tangerinetoad.blogspot.com/2009/01/will-facebook-be-death-of-twitter.html">comparing Facebook to Twitter</a> is <a href="http://www.thisisherd.com/2008/12/twitter-and-facebook-apples-and-oranges.html">like comparing apples and oranges</a>.</p>
<p>They are only similar in a broad sense, yet their appeal, uses and target audiences are different &#8211; Twitter will always be relatively niche when compared to Facebook, which is rapidly becoming the Google of social networks (or perhaps a better comparison, like hotmail was to webmail 7-8 years ago).</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the sixth most popular network in Britain is a Polish site: <a href="http://nasza-klasa.pl/">Nasza-Klasa</a>, taking into account the fact that over the past five years around half a million Poles have come to work in the UK.<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_02f24nJ8yic/SXgeL1hyfHI/AAAAAAAABK8/z7YQjti5fBE/s1600-h/Top_UK_social_networks_2009_facebook_youtube_twitter_bebo_myspace_table.png" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5294014550670212210" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 228px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_02f24nJ8yic/SXgeL1hyfHI/AAAAAAAABK8/z7YQjti5fBE/s400/Top_UK_social_networks_2009_facebook_youtube_twitter_bebo_myspace_table.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/twitter-grows-and-grows.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

