<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/tag/publishing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Proof that social media DOES work</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/proof-that-social-media-does-work.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=proof-that-social-media-does-work</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/proof-that-social-media-does-work.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The million dollar question we (and other agencies like us) are often asked, is &#8216;how can you evaluate social media&#8217; or more directly &#8211; &#8216;will it impact the bottom line.&#8217; At Rabbit we&#8217;re shortly publishing our favourite 20 &#8211; free that anyone can use &#8211; social media sentiment monitoring tools, but a report published in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">The  million dollar question we (and other agencies like us) are often asked,  is &#8216;how can you evaluate social media&#8217; or more directly &#8211; &#8216;will it  impact the bottom line.&#8217;</p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.therabbitagency.com" target="_blank">Rabbit</a> we&#8217;re shortly publishing our  favourite 20 &#8211; free that anyone can use &#8211; social media sentiment  monitoring tools, but a report <a href="http://3.ly/jIAH" target="_blank">published in emarketer is  also useful.</a></p>
<p>According to a US study, more than half of Facebook  fans (of a brand) are likely to make a purchase, while 67% of Twitter  followers reported the same.</p>
<p>6/10 Facebook fans also said they&#8217;d  be more likely to recommend the brand to friends, among Twitter users  that increased to 8/10.</p>
<p><img src="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/376317b49e8ebfee814dd56df/images/whybecomeafan.gif" border="0" alt="" width="324" height="479" /></p>
<p>And the main  reason people followed brands on Facebook?   To receive discounts and  promotions, so though not the most creative tactic in the book, straight  forward Facebook competitions and give-aways can work.</p>
<p><em>This is one of the items in <a href="http://therabbitagency.com/2010/03/news-from-the-rabbits/" target="_blank">this week&#8217;s Rabbit Feed newsletter &#8211; more info here!</a></em></p>
<p></span></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/03/social-media-pays-people-more-likely-to-buy-from-brands-they-follow.html">Social Media Pays: People More Likely to Buy from Brands they Follow</a> (marketingpilgrim.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=ec4f75b0-8e8d-410c-832e-4baee85a661f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/proof-that-social-media-does-work.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of the press release?  Or a necessary evil?</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/the-end-of-the-press-release-or-a-necessary-evil.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-end-of-the-press-release-or-a-necessary-evil</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/the-end-of-the-press-release-or-a-necessary-evil.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liesdamnedlies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cow PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk Singer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PollStream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now here&#8217;s a subject close to my heart, the continued usefulness or otherwise of the age old press release. Publisher Ragan Communications and PollStream carried out a survey in the States, which found that only 49% of PRs think &#8216;it&#8217;s as useful as ever&#8217;, while 33% thought it was a &#8216;necessary evil.&#8217; Ragan&#8217;s Lindsey Miller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pressrelease.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1025" title="pressrelease" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pressrelease-300x150.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="150" /></a>Now here&#8217;s a subject close to my heart, the continued usefulness or otherwise of the age old press release.    Publisher Ragan Communications and PollStream <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/less-than-half-of-pr-people-deem-press-releases-useful-10954/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">carried out a survey in the States</a>, which found that only 49% of PRs think &#8216;it&#8217;s as useful as ever&#8217;, while 33% thought it was a &#8216;necessary evil.&#8217;</p>
<p>Ragan&#8217;s Lindsey Miller says press releases are becoming ever less useful due to &#8211; yep, you guessed it &#8211; social media. <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/less-than-half-of-pr-people-deem-press-releases-useful-10954/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">According to Marketing Charts</a>, Ragan&#8217;s take is that communicators are using social media to get around &#8216;canned&#8217; information and to target and reach journalists.   And obviously via Twitter lists is yet another way that can be done.</p>
<p>I guess it all depends what you define a &#8216;press release.&#8217;   Does it really have to follow the conventional standard for it to be classed as one?  For example, some companies have started using blog posts in place of standard releases &#8211; <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/">Twitter is a prime example</a>.   It&#8217;s something that makes sense in certain circumstances but to my mind, a corporate post is a release of sorts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bohman/">Image &#8211; Bohman </a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/confidential-twitter-docs-fly-into-inboxes.html">Confidential Twitter Docs Fly Into Inboxes</a> (marketingpilgrim.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/facebook-fan-pages-are-the-new-microsite/">Facebook Fan Pages are the New Microsite</a> (newcommbiz.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/131166">Consumers Need to Hear About You via Social Media&#8230; then they&#8217;ll search for your brand</a> (socialmediatoday.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=b0b264f2-2f94-4ee8-a08a-14a8487374e0" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/the-end-of-the-press-release-or-a-necessary-evil.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

