<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; MySpace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/tag/myspace/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 14:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The rise of tumblr</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Karp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabbit Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rabbit rabbit agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smarter Planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=2251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html' addthis:title='The rise of tumblr '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Over at Rabbit (the day job), we&#8217;ve just switched over to Tumblr.   Rather than use Tumblr to host a scrapbook somewhere outside our main website, we&#8217;ve used it to house the site itself making us (we think) one of the first European agencies to have done so. And so, as this site is all about [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html' addthis:title='The rise of tumblr ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html' addthis:title='The rise of tumblr '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/I-heart-Tumblr.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2260" title="I-heart-Tumblr" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/I-heart-Tumblr.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="309" /></a></p>
<p>Over at <a href="http://www.therabbitagency.com" target="_blank">Rabbit </a>(the day job), we&#8217;ve just switched over to <a href="http://www.tumblr.com" target="_blank">Tumblr</a>.    Rather than use Tumblr to host a scrapbook somewhere outside our main  website, we&#8217;ve used it to house the site itself making us (we think) one  of the first European agencies to have done so.</p>
<p>And so, as this site is all about stats it seems  appropriate to put forward some Tumblr themed ones.</p>
<p>Tumblr of course isn&#8217;t new.    Time Magazine listed it as <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1633488_1633608_1633638,00.html" target="_blank">one of its top fifty websites as far back as 2007</a>.    However, in particular over the past six months it has gained a lot of traction.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/tumblr-pageviews.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2253" title="tumblr-pageviews" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/tumblr-pageviews.png" alt="" width="570" height="325" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/02/08/6011831-facebook-sucks-only-12-percent-of-your-internet-time">According to Comscore&#8217;s 2010 US digital year in review</a>,  Tumblr was on 6.7 million US users in December which is still small  compared to Twitter (23.6 million US users), LinkedIn (30 million users)  or even the shrinking MySpace (50 million users).   However that  represents growth of 128%.</p>
<p>Looking at Alexa, Tumblr is actually ahead of MySpace, ranking no.59 in the<a href="http://www.alexa.com/topsites" target="_blank"> top 500 website list,</a> with MySpace at no.65 (<a href="http://socialmedianz.com/opinion2/2011/02/16/tumblr-turning-four-and-growing-fast/" target="_blank">via SocialMediaNz</a>).   And Compete similarly has Tumblr up from 3.9 million unique visitors in January 2010 to 10 million by the end of the year.</p>
<p>At the same time, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/28/karp-tumblr-quarter-billion-impressions-week/">Tumblr boss David Karp told Techcrunch</a> that they are currently gaining an incredible quarter of a billion impressions a week.</p>
<p>David Karp says that the social element of Tumblr is key to that with 65% of  page views coming from people looking at their Tumblr dashboard and  jumping over to sites that they&#8217;ve previously said they liked.</p>
<p>What sectors are driving that growth?  Media and fashion, with consumer brands being by and large fairly slow to adopt the lite blogging platform.</p>
<p>In (city guide website) Black Book earlier this month, <a href="http://www.blackbookmag.com/article/ann-taylors-on-tumblr-is-on-tumblr/24776">Chris Mohney wrote</a>, <em>&#8220;For  reasons I&#8217;m still not sure I really grasp, big brands have been really  slow to adopt Tumblr&#8230;regular consumer brands that otherwise can&#8217;t get  their pants off fast enough for Facebook, Twitter, or Foursquare have  been a little skittish around the general anarchy and bloggy  generalities of Tumblr.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>However an article on <a href="http://flavorwire.com/122035/brands-on-tumblr-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly">Flavorwire &#8216;Brands on Tumblr, the good, the bad and the ugly&#8217;</a> lists several, profiling EMI Music, Comedy Central, <a href="http://smarterplanet.tumblr.com/">IBM&#8217;s Smarter Planet</a>. and Standard Hotels.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got more on Tumblr and why we decided to make the switch over at The Rabbit Feed, <a href="http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=376317b49e8ebfee814dd56df&amp;id=159628e864" target="_blank">our weekly email newsletter</a>.  And no, I am not changing this site from wordpress to Tumblr &#8211; not just yet anyway!</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/21/founder-stories-why-david-karp-started-tumblr-blogs-dont-work-for-most-people/">(Founder Stories) Why David Karp Started Tumblr: Blogs Don&#8217;t Work For Most People</a> (techcrunch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703313304576132221659118068.html">Fashion Bloggers Move to the Front</a> (online.wsj.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://thenextweb.com/industry/2011/01/28/tumblr-founder-says-that-users-who-complain-about-site-issues-should-go-away/">Tumblr founder says that users who complain about site issues should &#8220;go away&#8221;</a> (thenextweb.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.kwiksocial.com/all/2011/2/7/tumblr-is-becoming-fashion-hq-for-the-internet.html">Tumblr Is Becoming Fashion HQ For The Internet</a> (kwiksocial.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=6a1384f3-9c51-4a02-9322-29dd6a1bd00e" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html' addthis:title='The rise of tumblr ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/02/the-rise-of-tumblr.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook reaches 62% of online Americans</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=2080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html' addthis:title='Facebook reaches 62% of online Americans '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Another chart (from Comscore) showing how Facebook is the Google of social networks.    An online ad campaign can (in theory) target 62.4% of online Americans, with MySpace a distant second at 24.3%. Sure, numbers aren&#8217;t everything and so while Twitter in theory has a reach of 3%, it&#8217;s potential and influence is higher.    But, Facebook [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html' addthis:title='Facebook reaches 62% of online Americans ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html' addthis:title='Facebook reaches 62% of online Americans '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p>Another chart (<a href="http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2010/10/top-social-network-publishers-by-advertising-exposed-reach/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=%24%7Bdatamine%7D&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+comscoredatagems+%28The+comScore+Data+Mine%29&amp;utm_content=Netvibes">from Comscore</a>) showing how Facebook is the Google of social networks.    An online ad campaign can (in theory) target 62.4% of online Americans, with MySpace a distant second at 24.3%.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Top-Social-Network-Publishers-by-Advertising-Exposed-Reach-%_12878302596881.png"></a><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/comscorefacebook.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2083" title="comscorefacebook" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/comscorefacebook.jpg" alt="" width="608" height="369" /></a></p>
<p>Sure, numbers aren&#8217;t everything and so while Twitter in theory has a reach of 3%, it&#8217;s potential and influence is higher.    But, Facebook remains just about the only game in town when it comes to mass consumer reach.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/10/23/top-social-networks-with-the-widest-advertising-reach-chart/">Top Social Networks With the Widest Advertising Reach [Chart]</a> (penn-olson.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303738504575568460409331560.html">MySpace, Apps Leak User Data</a> (online.wsj.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www10.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/technology/23facebook.html%3F_r%3D5&amp;a=26959937&amp;rid=a2806cd7-2587-8441-b615-0b317777193e&amp;e=e298a6171d59b0a18c1d0bc42229b66e">Marketers Can Glean Private Data on Facebook</a> (nytimes.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=a2806cd7-2587-8441-b615-0b317777193e" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html' addthis:title='Facebook reaches 62% of online Americans ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/10/facebook-reaches-62-of-online-americans.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After a blip, Facebook carries on with world domination</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html' addthis:title='After a blip, Facebook carries on with world domination '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>After showing a slight drop in US (Compete and Comscore) and Worldwide (Comscore) Facebook visitor numbers in February, both metrics firms now confirm that it&#8217;s business as usual with the social network growing in popularity again. Comscore says that Facebook had 472 million uniques in Jan, 463 million in March and 484 million in Feb.   [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html' addthis:title='After a blip, Facebook carries on with world domination ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html' addthis:title='After a blip, Facebook carries on with world domination '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p>After showing a slight drop in US (Compete and Comscore) and Worldwide  (Comscore) Facebook visitor numbers in February, both metrics firms now  confirm that it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/05/04/web-measurement-firms-show-higher-facebook-us-and-world-growth-for-march-2010/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InsideFacebook+%28Inside+Facebook%29&amp;utm_content=Netvibes">business  as usual</a> with the social network growing in popularity again.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/facebook.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1506" title="facebook" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/facebook.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="277" /></a><br />
Comscore says that Facebook had 472 million uniques in Jan, 463 million  in March and 484 million in Feb.   However, Comscore seems to suggest  that the February blip was to do with social media as a whole as both  MySpace and Twitter also saw drops in February and a rise again in  March.</p>
<p>And the stats from Facebook itself?   At the beginning of February  Facebook had itself down as having 400 million active monthly users.  <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/05/04/web-measurement-firms-show-higher-facebook-us-and-world-growth-for-march-2010/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InsideFacebook+%28Inside+Facebook%29&amp;utm_content=Netvibes">Inside  Facebook then estimated it</a> at 436 million for March using the Facebook advertiser  tool.<br />
<a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/05/04/web-measurement-firms-show-higher-facebook-us-and-world-growth-for-march-2010/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InsideFacebook+%28Inside+Facebook%29&amp;utm_content=Netvibes"><br />
Inside Facebook mentions</a> Facebook staffers in saying that it&#8217;s now  passed the 450 million active user mark.   To put that into perspective,  there are now more Facebook users than there are people in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_America">South America (382  million</a>).</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/21/facebook-500-million-visitors-comscore/">Facebook Closing In On 500 Million Visitors A Month (ComScore)</a> (techcrunch.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=3de7ee04-b8a2-40da-bedc-4c625c30dcfd" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html' addthis:title='After a blip, Facebook carries on with world domination ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/05/after-a-blip-facebook-carries-on-with-world-domination.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook, Twitter use takes off on mobiles</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html' addthis:title='Facebook, Twitter use takes off on mobiles '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>The other day I posted about Nielsen&#8217;s stats showing that the over 25s (and over 35s in particular) are the most active on mobile social networks, as opposed to teens.   The other giant metrics firm, Comscore (via Marketing Charts), has now produced figures about the growth of mobile social networking in general. Looking at the [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html' addthis:title='Facebook, Twitter use takes off on mobiles ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html' addthis:title='Facebook, Twitter use takes off on mobiles '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p><a href="../2010/03/think-mobile-networking-is-all-about-teens-think-again.html" target="_blank">The  other day I posted about Nielsen&#8217;s stats</a> showing that the over 25s  (and over 35s in particular) are the most active on mobile social  networks, as opposed to teens.   The other giant metrics firm, Comscore (<a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/mobile-facebook-twitter-growth-explodes-12179/comscore-mobile-twitter-facebook-jan-10-mar-2010jpg/" target="_blank">via  Marketing Charts</a>), has now produced figures about the growth of  mobile social networking in general.</p>
<p>Looking at the US, Comscore worked out that access to Facebook via  mobiles grew by 112% over the past year, while mobile Twitter access  went up 347%.</p>
<p>At the same time, MySpace continues to decline on mobiles as well as on  the Web, with 7% less users accessing it via their mobile devices.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/comscore-mobile-social-networking-jan-10-mar-2010.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1420" title="comscore-mobile-social-networking-jan-10-mar-2010" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/comscore-mobile-social-networking-jan-10-mar-2010-263x300.jpg" alt="" width="263" height="300" /></a><br />
Unsurprisingly, the growth in mobile social networking comes from  smartphone users &#8211; hence the over 35s that Nielsen talked about who are  both more likely to be able to afford one and also get one via their  jobs.    30.8% of smartphone users accessed mobile social networks,  compared to just 6.8% of more run of the mill &#8216;feature phone&#8217; users.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=b3b04d54-00f5-4760-8a12-61c3eb1bed78" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html' addthis:title='Facebook, Twitter use takes off on mobiles ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/03/facebook-twitter-use-takes-off-on-mobiles.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sysomos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html' addthis:title='Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7 '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>A well known rule of thumb in business is the so-called Pareto principle (or the 80/20 rule) that 20% of participants will account for 80% of the activity.   Metrics firm Nielsen decided to test out if the same applies to Twitter &#8211; do 20% of tweeple account for 80% of what takes place on Twitter. [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html' addthis:title='Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7 ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html' addthis:title='Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7 '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p>A well known rule of thumb in business is the so-called Pareto principle  (or the 80/20 rule) that 20% of participants will account for 80% of  the activity.   <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/social-norms-twitter-users-follow-the-797-rule-in-the-u-k/" target="_blank">Metrics  firm Nielsen decided to test out if the same applies to Twitter</a> &#8211;  do 20% of tweeple account for 80% of what takes place on Twitter.</p>
<p>The answer is no.   At least in the UK, an even smaller number &#8211; 7% &#8211;  account for 79% of Twitter activity.<br />
<a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twitter-uk-usage.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1389 alignleft" title="twitter-uk-usage" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twitter-uk-usage.png" alt="" width="475" height="281" /></a></p>
<p>Nielsen found that &#8216;light&#8217; users (less than 2 minutes per month,  actually broken across 30 days that is pretty much zero) account for 67%  of the audience, medium users (22 mins per month, so still less than a  minute a day) account for 26%, while heavy users (1hr+ a month) account  for 7% of UK tweeple.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s stats confirm previous ones by Canadian research firm Sysomos,  <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/08/twitters-power-users-who-are-they.html" target="_blank">which  showed that there is</a> a group of 5% of Twitter power users who are  responsible for 75% of Twitter activity.</p>
<p>Similarly, in January, RJ  Metrics produced  a report <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html">saying</a> that only 17% of Twitter accounts had sent a single  tweet over the month, which would put Twitter&#8217;s &#8216;real&#8217; user base at  around 10-15 million worldwide (with perhaps 700-900k in the UK) as  opposed to the 75 million registered users.</p>
<p>Again, the fact that there are probably less than a million people in  the UK making habitual use of Twitter shouldn&#8217;t matter.   News often  breaks on Twitter and, due to the large proportion of bloggers and  journalists that listen in on the network, moves elsewhere.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mydavidcameron.com/about/five-lessons" target="_blank">As  the founder of spoof political website mydavidcameron.com (lampooning  ads featuring the UK Conservative Party leader) found</a>, chatter about  his website started on Twitter and then quickly moved on from there to  Facebook and finally to the media at large.</p>
<p>Finally, it&#8217;s also worth bearing in mind Nielsen&#8217;s observations that  other networks similarly have a core of power users who dominate.  Three  percent (3%) of MySpace visitors account for 63% of time spent on the  site while 5% of LinkedIn visitors account for 50% of LinkedIn activity.   A  challenge for marketers targeting those networks is obviously to zero in  on, and find out who those three or five percent are.</p>
<p>Linking in with its role as a network, which <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60Q0K520100127" target="_blank">according to  Reuters is rapidly gaining &#8216;tech lock in&#8217;</a>, Facebook however has a higher participation rate -  52% of users account for almost everything (98%) that goes on.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/heavy-usage.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1390 alignleft" title="heavy-usage" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/heavy-usage.png" alt="" width="500" height="387" /></a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://mashable.com/2010/02/23/twitter-7-79/">Power Users Drive the Vast Majority of Twitter Usage [STATS]</a> (mashable.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2010/02/time-spent-on-social-networks-up-82-around-the-wrold/">Time Spent on Social Networks up 82% Around the World</a> (briansolis.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/24/measurement-firms-dont-agree-on-january-2010-traffic-for-facebook-myspace-and-twitter/">Measurement Firms Don&#8217;t Agree on January 2010 Traffic for Facebook, MySpace and Twitter</a> (insidefacebook.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=cdebfefd-2341-405f-8e23-a653d0af01de" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html' addthis:title='Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7 ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/02/forget-the-8020-principle-with-twitter-it-is-797.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women get 2/3 of profile views on social media</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Business School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Advertising Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html' addthis:title='Women get 2/3 of profile views on social media '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>The other month a report came out from Harvard Business School showing that 10% of users create 90% of tweets (or &#8211; the alternative I tend to use from Sysomos, a core of 5% accounts for 75% of activity). It received a fair amount of attention, but some of the other findings around how we [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html' addthis:title='Women get 2/3 of profile views on social media ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html' addthis:title='Women get 2/3 of profile views on social media '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/binoculars.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1233" title="binoculars" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/binoculars-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>The other month a report came out from Harvard Business School showing that 10% of users create 90% of tweets (or &#8211; the alternative I tend to use from Sysomos, <a href="../2009/08/twitters-power-users-who-are-they.html">a core of 5% accounts for 75% of activity</a>).</p>
<p>It received <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8089508.stm">a fair amount</a> of attention, <a href="http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6156.html">but some of the other findings</a> around how we use social networks are worth looking at.   In particular, according to academic Mikolaj Jan Piskorski:</p>
<p>We&#8217;re by and large visually led.  <em> &#8220;Seventy percent of all actions are related to viewing pictures or viewing other people&#8217;s profiles&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The latter also shows an element of voyeurism, in particular by men towards women on social networks.    The biggest usage categories are men looking at women they don&#8217;t know, followed by men looking at women they do know.    In fact, women get 2/3 of all page views.</p>
<p>This includes men in existing relationships looking at women they don&#8217;t know.   According to Piskorski, <em>&#8220;it&#8217;s an easy way to see if anyone might be a better match.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>MySpace snobbery?</strong><br />
Finally, the findings on MySpace are interesting.   MySpace has been written off as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/11/myspace-bebo-social-networking">a dying social network</a>, despite the fact that it still has 70 million regular users in the US alone.</p>
<p>Pisorski raises the question of whether a lot of the negative press coverage stems from the fact that media and creative types like ourselves no longer use it:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The fascinating answer, acquired by studying a dataset of 100,000 MySpace users, is that they largely populate smaller cities and communities in the south and central parts of the country.&#8221; </em> Alabama, Arkansas, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Florida.</p>
<p>In other words, <em>&#8220;MySpace has a PR problem because its users are in places where they don&#8217;t have much contact with people who create news that gets read by others.    Other than that, there is really no difference between users of Facebook and MySpace, except they are poorer on MySpace.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Reminds me a little bit of <a href="http://www.iabuk.net/en/1/events2009mobiledebatetwo.mxs">a recent debate about mobile apps at the Internet Advertising Bureau</a>, where one of the arguments against apps (and for mobile sites) was that apps are talked up partially because creative directors in marketing agencies love iPhones.<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gerlos/" target="_blank">Image &#8211; Gerlos</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Wildcat2030/status/7089812956" target="_blank">Via Wildcat 2030</a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.sweetbusinesses.com/2009/12/27/why-social-networking-sites-are-so-popular.html">Why Social Networking Sites are So Popular</a> (sweetbusinesses.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/top-7-disruptions-of-the-year/">Top 7 Disruptions of the Year</a> (wired.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.revenews.com/andrewwee/boom-in-url-shorteners-equals-boom-in-malware-and-spyware/">Boom in URL Shorteners Equals Boom in Malware and Spyware</a> (revenews.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=2420c3ec-65ed-4147-8736-4d9cbfd380d1" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html' addthis:title='Women get 2/3 of profile views on social media ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/women-get-23-of-profile-views-on-social-media.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study shows women dominate on social networks</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html' addthis:title='Study shows women dominate on social networks '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Over the past two years there&#8217;s been a raft of research showing that women are increasingly more active than men in social media&#8230;for example last year there was the Rapleaf study showing that women tended to have more social network friends than men. Another piece of research by Royal Pingdom confirms the trend.  It shows [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html' addthis:title='Study shows women dominate on social networks ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html' addthis:title='Study shows women dominate on social networks '  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div><p>Over the past two years there&#8217;s been a raft of research showing that women are increasingly more active than men in social media&#8230;for example last year <a href="../2008/05/women-make-friends-online-men-collect-contacts.html">there was the Rapleaf study</a> showing that women tended to have more social network friends than men.</p>
<p><a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/11/27/study-males-vs-females-in-social-networks/">Another piece of research by Royal Pingdom</a> confirms the trend.  It shows that most of the networks that could be considered to be &#8216;social&#8217; in the real sense of the word &#8211; <a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook" rel="homepage" href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Twitter" rel="homepage" href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="MySpace" rel="homepage" href="http://myspace.com">MySpace</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Bebo" rel="homepage" href="http://bebo.com">Bebo</a> have a user base that&#8217;s 50%+ female.  Networks that are arguably much more functional in the sense that you save or tag articles &#8211; <a class="zem_slink" title="Reddit" rel="homepage" href="http://reddit.com/">Reddit</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Digg" rel="homepage" href="http://digg.com">Digg</a> by comparison have more of a male bias.</p>
<p>The chart below shows more detail.   All in all, 53% of users across the 19 sites were female and 47% were male.<a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/malefemalesocmedia.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1130" title="malefemalesocmedia" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/malefemalesocmedia.png" alt="" width="499" height="431" /></a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://kevin.lexblog.com/2009/10/articles/social-networking-1/19-of-internet-users-use-twitter-or-update-status-site-up-nearly-100-since-april/">19% of Internet users use Twitter or update status site : Up nearly 100% since April</a> (kevin.lexblog.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/10/03/women-rule-the-social-web/">Women Rule the Social Web</a> (mashable.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=dd493391-8ed5-4dc9-af0d-eca26d39d487" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html' addthis:title='Study shows women dominate on social networks ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/study-shows-women-dominate-on-social-networks.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

