<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/tag/microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The top three spots on Google get 58% of clicks</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/the-top-three-spots-on-google-get-58-of-clicks.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-top-three-spots-on-google-get-58-of-clicks</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/the-top-three-spots-on-google-get-58-of-clicks.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chitika]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/the-top-three-spots-on-google-get-58-of-clicks.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a reason to pay more attention to your search engine rankings &#8211; the top three spots on Google get 58% of clicks.   Optify (via Searchengine watch) carried out a study, which showed that websites at the top of Google get an average of 36.4% of clicks, those in second place 12.5% and those in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/organic-CTR-by-search-position-1-20-thumb-460x264-11742.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2450" title="organic-CTR-by-search-position-1-20-thumb-460x264-11742" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/organic-CTR-by-search-position-1-20-thumb-460x264-11742.png" alt="" width="460" height="264" /></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a reason to pay more attention to your search engine rankings &#8211; the top three spots on Google get 58% of clicks.   <a href="http://www.optify.net/guides/organic-click-through-rate-curve"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.optify.net/guides/organic-click-through-rate-curve">Optify</a> (via <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/110421-092523">Searchengine watch</a>) carried out a study, which showed that websites at the top of Google get an average of 36.4% of clicks, those in second place 12.5% and those in third 9.5%.</p>
<p>That chimes in <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/100525-160427">with an earlier Chitika study</a>, showing that the no 1 spot on Google gets 34.35% of traffic.   Optify also says that being any further back than page two has no real business value for you at all.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, as I work for a <a href="http://www.therabbitagency.com">social media agency</a>, I am a big believer in SEO + social working together.    <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html">For example, Comscore has shown that 50% of &#8216;social media exposed&#8217; surfers</a> search for product terms every day compared to 33% of non-exposed surfers.    In other words, SEO can help improve your rankings but social media can prompt them to try and find out more in the first place.</p>
<p>Then of course, the search engine giants themselves are constantly looking for ways to embrace so-called &#8216;social search.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/10/BUKF1IRL5J.DTL&amp;type=tech" target="_blank">The San Francisco Chronicle has a good summary</a> of how search engines are tapping into social.  As (MIcrosoft) Bing&#8217;s Paul Yiu says in the piece, &#8220;search up until recently has been a lonely experience.    We want to introduce people as an important part of search.&#8221;</p>
<p>Related articles</p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/110421-092523">Top Google Result Gets 36.4% of Clicks [Study]</a> (searchenginewatch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://seome.me/story/4542678122/bing-tests-new-homepage-layout-sewatch">Bing Tests New Homepage Layout #SEWatch</a> (seome.me)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://seome.me/story/4763875644/google-map-maker-user-generated-tagging-of-live-google-maps-sewatch">Google Map Maker: User Generated Tagging of Live Google Maps #SEWatch</a> (seome.me)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://seome.me/story/1743915379/foursquare-wants-to-pair-with-google-yahoo-bing-and-other-search-players-sewatch">Foursquare Wants To Pair With Google, Yahoo, Bing And Other Search Players @SEWatch</a> (seome.me)</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=e652274a-93ce-8bbe-b84d-747682caf51a" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/the-top-three-spots-on-google-get-58-of-clicks.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With activity down 16 per cent, is the age of search slowly drawing to a close?</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/08/with-activity-down-16-is-the-age-of-search-slowly-drawing-to-a-close.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=with-activity-down-16-is-the-age-of-search-slowly-drawing-to-a-close</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/08/with-activity-down-16-is-the-age-of-search-slowly-drawing-to-a-close.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The end of search is a theme that&#8217;s been talked about a lot in the past &#8211; as long ago as in Feb 2008, Ben Kunz of Media Associates produced a series of graphs from Google Trends showing that search volumes were significantly down for a range of what you might call staple terms &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of search is a theme that&#8217;s been talked about a lot in the past &#8211; as long ago as in Feb 2008, <a href="http://www.thoughtgadgets.com/2008/02/google-results-down-50-heres-why.html">Ben Kunz of Media Associates produced</a> a series of graphs from Google Trends showing that search volumes were  significantly down for a range of what you might call staple terms &#8211;  music, furniture, office supplies etc.</p>
<p>Some of it is wishful thinking as many of us wish for the age of Google to  start drawing to a close (whether the age of Facebook is any better is  of course a different matter altogether).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-us-search-sites-for-july-2010/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NielsenWire+%28Nielsen+Wire%29&amp;utm_content=Netvibes">And the latest Nielsen search stats</a> from the US show that Google is as dominant as ever, controlling almost  2/3 (64.2%) of the search market &#8211; a share that&#8217;s hardly changed since  last year, despite all the new bells and whistles that Microsoft&#8217;s Bing (on 13.6%)  has been rolling out.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Top-U.S.-Search-Sites-for-July-2010-Nielsen-Wire_1283032573284.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1858" title="Top U.S. Search Sites for July 2010 | Nielsen Wire_1283032573284" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Top-U.S.-Search-Sites-for-July-2010-Nielsen-Wire_1283032573284.png" alt="" width="558" height="204" /></a><br />
It&#8217;s the second table from the Nielsen post however that makes for more interesting reading.    Over the past year, search activity is down 16%  &#8211; 17% in the case of Google.   Yahoo! (-30%) performed particularly badly, though despite  it&#8217;s still small share Bing (+28%) has done well.   So all those extra  features <em>are</em> paying off after all.</p>
<p>OK, so with almost nine million searches being conducted in the US in  July, search is certainly not dead.  But a drop of close to a fifth year on year is still significant, and one explanation has to be that  people get more and more of what they need and want via social media.   There <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/02/15/facebook-driving-more-traffic-than-google/">is that research from earlier in the year</a> after all about Facebook now driving more traffic to major news and entertainment portals than Google.</p>
<p>At the very least it reinforces what Comscore found last year &#8211; that  search and social media campaigns now need to work very much in tandem,  with a <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html">paid search campaign supported by social activity</a> being 2.23x more effective than if conducted on its own.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/08/17/the-search-market-isnt-always-what-it-seems-to-be">The Search Market Isn&#8217;t Always What it Seems to Be</a> (webpronews.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/08/28/google-starts-its-own-rocketboom/">Google starts its own Rocketboom</a> (tech.fortune.cnn.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-20014964-265.html?part=rss&amp;subj=Webware">Google starts video series showcasing hot searches</a> (news.cnet.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/6240-comscore-bing-is-gaining-on-google">Numbers Game: Bing goes up as Google&#8217;s search share drops</a> (econsultancy.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=98368ad7-44d3-4583-9a9d-8dd7d24a2cfa" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/08/with-activity-down-16-is-the-age-of-search-slowly-drawing-to-a-close.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Zeitgeist gives Bebo, Daily Motion and Nintendo food for thought</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/google-zeitgeist-gives-bebo-daily-motion-and-nintendo-food-for-thought.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-zeitgeist-gives-bebo-daily-motion-and-nintendo-food-for-thought</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/google-zeitgeist-gives-bebo-daily-motion-and-nintendo-food-for-thought.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dirkthecow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cow digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cow Digital digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirk Singer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louise Doherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a short post for the forthcoming Cow Digital digest, which Louise Doherty and myself put together every week.  Sign up for it here! According to Google, the fastest growing search terms for 2009 so far have been Michael Jackson, Facebook and Tuenti, the latter being a leading Spanish social network.   Meanwhile the top [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a short post for the forthcoming <a href="http://www.cowdigital.co.uk" target="_blank">Cow Digital</a><a href="http://us1.campaign-archive.com/?u=376317b49e8ebfee814dd56df&amp;id=370ca0746f&amp;e=0059292e33" target="_blank"> digest</a>, which <a href="http://www.twitter.com/louisedoherty">Louise Doherty</a> and myself put together every week.  <a href="http://thisiscow.us1.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=376317b49e8ebfee814dd56df&amp;id=febfabb2e2" target="_blank">Sign up for it here!</a></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_search_queries_of_2009.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+%28ReadWriteWeb%29&amp;utm_content=Netvibes" target="_blank">According to Google</a>, the fastest growing search terms for 2009 so far have been Michael Jackson, Facebook and Tuenti, the latter being a leading Spanish social network.   Meanwhile the top three searches for Microsoft&#8217;s search engine &#8216;Bing&#8217;, are likewise Michael Jackson and Facebook, with Swine Flu in third place.</p>
<p>Perhaps of more interest is Google&#8217;s list of fast falling searches.  Barack Obama, Amy Winehouse and Heath Ledger all figure.   <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/what-did-the-internet-search-for-in-2009_1259698622865.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1133" title="what-did-the-internet-search-for-in-2009_1259698622865" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/what-did-the-internet-search-for-in-2009_1259698622865.png" alt="" width="316" height="389" /></a></p>
<p>So, perhaps worryingly for the brands in question do video sharing site Daily Motion, social network Bebo and Nintendo&#8217;s game console, the wii.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=1ca3445b-6520-497d-8420-1076b56c2b1a" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/12/google-zeitgeist-gives-bebo-daily-motion-and-nintendo-food-for-thought.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows &#8211; Google not making us stupid after all</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/research-shows-google-not-making-us-stupid-after-all.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=research-shows-google-not-making-us-stupid-after-all</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/research-shows-google-not-making-us-stupid-after-all.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liesdamnedlies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search engines make you smarter, so say researchers from Penn State University (via Science Daily).    Well&#8230;kind of.   But they don&#8217;t make you stupid as Nicholas Carr claimed in his seminal Atlantic Magazine article last year. Researchers looked at search habits of 72 participants engaging in 426 tasks.   Rather than search being used to find out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search engines make you smarter, so say researchers from Penn State University (<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091119111417.htm">via Science Daily</a>).    Well&#8230;kind of.   But <a href="../2009/08/recycle-a-blog-post-day-is-the-internet-dulling-our-senses-from-june-2008.html">they don&#8217;t make you stupid</a> as Nicholas Carr claimed in his seminal Atlantic Magazine article last year.</p>
<p>Researchers looked at search habits of 72 participants engaging in 426 tasks.   Rather than search being used to find out new stuff, search engines were &#8220;primarily used for fact checking users&#8217; own internal knowledge.&#8221;   According to the academics, that means that search is actually part of our own internal learning process.</p>
<p>Hence the fears about students for example getting lazy and just using Google rather than their brains to find out answers might be incorrect.  Instead, Google, Bing et al support &#8220;higher level information needs&#8221;, i.e to increase the chances that we get the right answer and to put detail on things we already know.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/_1259399362290.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1124" title="_1259399362290" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/_1259399362290.png" alt="" width="500" height="256" /></a></p>
<p>That makes sense if you look at how search habits are evolving, in particular lengthening.   <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/alan-long/2009/11/searches_getting_longer.html">Last week </a>Hitwise&#8217;s Asia-Pacific analyst Alan Long put out a post on lengthening search terms.   Something that Hitwise says is an international trend &#8211; one and two word searches have gone down over the past three years and 3+ word searches have gone up.</p>
<p>People already have a fair idea of what they are after when they go to search, hence more specific searches.  As a result, search is as much to validate and build on existing knowledge as to find new one.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://mumbrella.com.au/microsofts-bing-to-power-yahoo7-search-12489">Microsoft&#8217;s Bing okayed to power Yahoo!7 Search</a> (mumbrella.com.au)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/did_bings_growth_spurt_come_to_a_halt_in_september.php">Did Bing&#8217;s Growth Spurt Come to a Halt in September?</a> (readwriteweb.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/11/25/twitter-doesn%25e2%2580%2599t-pass-along-google-juice/">Twitter Doesn&#8217;t Pass Along Google-juice</a> (siliconangle.net)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=aabf0d50-9667-49ee-9339-ee4bf9335dfd" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/research-shows-google-not-making-us-stupid-after-all.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s global share of Internet time up by 193%</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/facebooks-global-share-of-internet-time-up-by-193.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebooks-global-share-of-internet-time-up-by-193</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/facebooks-global-share-of-internet-time-up-by-193.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dirkthecow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ComScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share of Internet time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Live Messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metrics company Comscore has come out with a study on global Internet use by hours spent surfing. Surprisingly, Microsoft&#8217;s range of websites &#8211; in particular Windows Live Messenger &#8211; leads, with 15% of time spent online globally. However at the same time as Australian website Digital Media points out, YouTube and Facebook, arguably the two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/microsoft-sites-captures-largest-share-of-time-spent-online-worldwide-comscore-inc_1257658077064.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1046" title="microsoft-sites-captures-largest-share-of-time-spent-online-worldwide-comscore-inc_1257658077064" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/microsoft-sites-captures-largest-share-of-time-spent-online-worldwide-comscore-inc_1257658077064.png" alt="" width="390" height="389" /></a>Metrics company Comscore <a href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/11/Microsoft_Sites_Captures_Largest_Share_of_Time_Spent_Online_Worldwide">has come out with</a> a study on global Internet use by hours spent surfing.   Surprisingly, Microsoft&#8217;s range of websites &#8211; in particular Windows Live Messenger &#8211; leads, with 15% of time spent online globally.</p>
<p>However at the same time as Australian website Digital Media <a href="http://www.digital-media.net.au/article/One-in-ten-minutes-spent-online-spent-is-on-Facebook-or-Youtube/504752.aspx">points out</a>, YouTube and Facebook, arguably the two highest profile players in the social media category, took up almost 10% of the 27 billion global Internet hours people in Sept 09.</p>
<p>Looking at Facebook, its share of hours grew by 193%.   It also over-indexes significantly in both Europe (6.6% share vs 5.1% globally), and the Middle East / Africa (where it has 8%).<a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/microsoft-sites-captures-largest-share-of-time-spent-online-worldwide2-comscore-inc_1257658091858.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1045" title="microsoft-sites-captures-largest-share-of-time-spent-online-worldwide2-comscore-inc_1257658091858" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/microsoft-sites-captures-largest-share-of-time-spent-online-worldwide2-comscore-inc_1257658091858-300x192.png" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that Comscore&#8217;s data excluded time spent surfing from a mobile device.   If that had been factored in, then Facebook&#8217;s share would almost certainly have been higher.    According to Facebook&#8217;s Director of Mobile, Henri Moissinac, <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/09/the-mobile-internet-marches-on-facebook-usage-up-300.html">the network now has</a> 65 million mobile users &#8211; or 25% of its total reach.</p>
<p>Recently, stats showed that Facebook <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/facebook-almost-at-100-million-users-in-europe.html">had reached almost 100 million users</a> in Europe.   Though the UK is by far the leading territory with 20+ million plus users, the network showed particularly strong growth in Italy, Germany and Turkey.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/07/10-biggest-social-media/">The 10 Biggest Social Media Stories This Week</a> (mashable.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.techsmart.co.za/features/feature_articles/Reaching_the_next_billion.html">How a SA company might just change the mobile app game forever.</a> (techsmart.co.za)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=25f6431a-b39b-413a-a03c-9e8515009b1f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/11/facebooks-global-share-of-internet-time-up-by-193.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

