<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; consumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/tag/consumer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Internet is now the preferred customer services channel</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2012/01/the-internet-is-now-the-preferred-customer-services-channel.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-internet-is-now-the-preferred-customer-services-channel</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2012/01/the-internet-is-now-the-preferred-customer-services-channel.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[customer service innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SITEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Answers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=2839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="225" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/lifeisart1-300x225.jpg" class="attachment-medium wp-post-image" alt="lifeisart" title="lifeisart" /></p>The other day econsultancy released the findings of a SITEL-commissioned  (UK) study showing that 15% of 16-24 year olds prefer to use social media for customer services above any other channel.   Overall, across all age groups, 6% prefer to use social media, and 4% have actually complained on Twitter. Not that impressive, right? Actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" height="225" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/lifeisart1-300x225.jpg" class="attachment-medium wp-post-image" alt="lifeisart" title="lifeisart" /></p><p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/lifeisart1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2841" title="lifeisart" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/lifeisart1.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>The other day econsultancy <a href="http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8626-15-of-those-aged-16-24-turn-to-social-media-first-for-customer-service">released the findings</a> of a <a class="zem_slink" title="Sitel" href="http://www.sitel.com" rel="homepage">SITEL</a>-commissioned  (UK) study showing that 15% of 16-24 year olds prefer to use social media for customer services above any other channel.   Overall, across all age groups, 6% prefer to use social media, and 4% have actually complained on Twitter.</p>
<p>Not that impressive, right?</p>
<p>Actually that headline stat <a href="http://www.sitel.com/?p=News&amp;id=291">from the study</a>  needs to be read in terms of both the wider context, and in tandem with other findings from the survey.  These show that the Internet as a whole is now the preferred route to finding solutions to problems with products, services or brands.</p>
<p><strong>1/3 of consumers have used forums to find solutions</strong></p>
<p>In particular:</p>
<ul>
<li>57% of consumers across all age groups will search for a solution to a problem online first</li>
<li>33% have used forum or chat-based websites to find answers &#8211; in the UK, <a href="http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/">moneysavingexpert</a> is one that tends to come up fairly frequently</li>
<li>19% use a &#8216;question based&#8217; site like <a class="zem_slink" title="Quora" href="http://www.quora.com/" rel="homepage">Quora</a> or Yahoo! Answers, a number I found surprisingly high</li>
</ul>
<p>So what should the conclusions be?  I would highlight a number of things:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; Only 4% may have complained on Twitter, but remember that is across all industry sectors.   If you take certain sectors such as financial services, electronics and travel the % is almost much, much higher.</p>
<p>Indeed, in June Jaan Albrecht of Star Alliance <a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3287658/airline-klm-unleashes-dedicated-twitter-army-on-passengers/">said that 30% of customer feedback received</a> by the 27 member airlines comes via social media</p>
<p>2 &#8211; The stats about forums and question sites does show that any customer response programme online needs to embrace a lot more than Twitter and Facebook.  Monitoring needs to encompass all online touch-points where consumers can feed back, interact and ask questions</p>
<p>3 &#8211; The % of those that complain via social media is bound to increase.   In training sessions I do, I often talk of an (un) virtuous cycle &#8211; as consumers watch their peers circumventing the call centre or (worse) the written complaints procedure on Twitter, they will do the same.</p>
<p>At least anecdotally, one travel brand I trained earlier in the year told me that the tone of comments they had received on Twitter were much more insistent than previously &#8211; as far as consumer expectations are concerned, the bar is now higher</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lifeasart/271751746/">Image &#8211; Life is Art </a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/8626-15-of-those-aged-16-24-turn-to-social-media-first-for-customer-service">15% of those aged 16-24 turn to social media first for customer service</a> (econsultancy.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/social-media-replacing-customer-service-channels-at-banks-report/66272">Social media replacing customer service channels at banks: report</a> (zdnet.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.thebluedoor.com/uncategorized/15-of-young-people-use-social-media-for-customer-service">15% Of Young People Use Social Media For Customer Service</a> (thebluedoor.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=74e6133c-b7e5-495d-989d-8581c364982a" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2012/01/the-internet-is-now-the-preferred-customer-services-channel.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A key milestone: Mobiles pass TV as most essential media for under 25s</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/a-key-milestone-mobiles-pass-tv-as-most-essential-media-for-under-25s.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-key-milestone-mobiles-pass-tv-as-most-essential-media-for-under-25s</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/a-key-milestone-mobiles-pass-tv-as-most-essential-media-for-under-25s.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 04:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transposon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=2425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When referring to the shift from &#8216;old&#8217; to &#8216;new&#8217; media one piece of research I talk about again and again is a question Ofcom (the UK equivalent to the FCC) regularly asks consumers &#8211; what one piece of media can you not live without?   I use it, as it is a stat that gets to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When referring to the shift from &#8216;old&#8217; to &#8216;new&#8217; media one piece of research I talk about again and again is a question Ofcom (the UK equivalent to the FCC) regularly asks consumers &#8211; what one piece of media can you not live without?   I use it, as it is a stat that gets to the bottom of which media really matters to the consumer</p>
<p><a href="http://us1.campaign-archive.com/?u=376317b49e8ebfee814dd56df&amp;id=ecf0cd2a44&amp;e=">Previous results </a>showed that TV is still far in front with the Internet a  distant second and newspapers nowhere to be seen.   But for 18-25 year olds things were somewhat different.   Mobile phones and not PCs+Internet were in second place.   TV was in front, but not by much.<br />
<a href="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/media-literacy-pubs/"><br />
</a><a href="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/media-literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/adultmedialitreport11/">The latest results have changed</a> and an important milestone has been crossed:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mostmissed.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2426" title="mostmissed" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/mostmissed.png" alt="" width="621" height="386" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">TV remains the most-missed media for UK adults as a whole, although this has decreased from 50% in 2009 to 44% in 2010.   But for the first time,  adults aged 16-24 mention using a mobile phone (28%) and using the  internet (26%) ahead of watching television (23%).     Result &#8211; TV only campaigns are increasingly leaving consumers behind, and if you haven&#8217;t got a mobile element you are missing a lot of young adults completely.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Trust in social media increases</strong><br />
Another key stat: Trust in information relayed via social media and online media as a whole has increased.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/trust.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2427" title="trust" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/trust.png" alt="" width="586" height="352" /></a></p>
<p>34% trust what they read in newspapers, while 59% trust what they read on news websites.  Related to that, as another study showed, online articles <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/online-newspaper-articles-command-more-attention-than-print.html">command more attention</a> than their print equivalents.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/socialmediatrust.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2428" title="socialmediatrust" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/socialmediatrust.png" alt="" width="557" height="347" /></a></p>
<p>However at the same time, more consumers now trust rather than distrust what they see on social networks &#8211; 36% vs 33%.   That trust is most likely to be highest among women, 16-35 year olds and &#8216;AB&#8217; higher earners.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.bioscholar.com/2011/04/youths-inseparably-hooked-to-mobile-phones.html">Youths inseparably hooked to mobile phones</a> (news.bioscholar.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://r.zemanta.com/?u=http%3A//www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/apr/19/young-people-tv-mobiles-net&amp;a=41287659&amp;rid=ab6ad6e6-0347-8c18-a8ca-60a1830fb5bc&amp;e=f625454edd5add9999ed2778ccb555c1">Young people &#8216;would rather live without TV than mobiles or net&#8217;</a> (guardian.co.uk)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://telecomjunction.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/global-mobile-broadband-market-to-be-worth-us-233-billion-by-2015-but-arpu-will-decline/">Global Mobile Broadband Market To Be Worth US$ 233 Billion By 2015 But ARPU Will Decline</a> (telecomjunction.wordpress.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=ab6ad6e6-0347-8c18-a8ca-60a1830fb5bc" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2011/04/a-key-milestone-mobiles-pass-tv-as-most-essential-media-for-under-25s.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Internet making us stupid?  Maybe not &#8211; news consumption up 23%</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/is-the-internet-making-us-stupid-maybe-not-news-consumption-up-23.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-the-internet-making-us-stupid-maybe-not-news-consumption-up-23</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/is-the-internet-making-us-stupid-maybe-not-news-consumption-up-23.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Journalism Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Research Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This chart from Pew Research (via Marketing Charts) is interesting as it shows that since 1994 &#8211; ie the dawn of the Internet age &#8211; news consumption as a whole hasn&#8217;t gone down.   Rather though our overall news diet has shifted, consumers are still as interested (or not depending on your POV) in what&#8217;s going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This chart from Pew Research (<a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/middle-aged-educated-drive-increase-in-news-consumption-14252/pew-digital-news-time-spent-yesterday-sept-20101jpg/">via Marketing Charts</a>) is interesting as it shows that since 1994 &#8211; ie the dawn of the Internet age &#8211; news consumption as a whole hasn&#8217;t gone down.   Rather though our overall news diet has shifted, consumers are still as interested (or not depending on your POV) in what&#8217;s going on in the world as before.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pew-digital-news-time-spent-yesterday-sept-20101.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1943" title="pew-digital-news-time-spent-yesterday-sept-20101" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/pew-digital-news-time-spent-yesterday-sept-20101.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="498" /></a></p>
<p>Americans today consume 70 minutes worth of news a day &#8211; that&#8217;s 22.8% more than 2000.   The 57 minutes of news received via the traditional media of TV, radio and newspapers remain the same, yet on top of that there are now 13 minutes spent getting news online.     The online news total of 13 minutes is also now ahead of the print news total of 10 minutes.</p>
<p>That latter stat provides a good counter weight to the one released by the Columbia Journalism Review last year <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/07/88-of-newspaper-reading-time-is-in-print.html">claiming that 88% of newspaper reading time is in print</a>.   Perhaps both those surveys together point to the way we consume news being different, with online news being increasingly a commodity.   So we read the newspaper in print, but we read the article online.</p>
<p>Interesting as well that Pew also found that <a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/the-news-is-dead-long-live-the-news-half-of-americans-get-their-news-online-3x-a-week.html">news searches were up</a>, showing that we are much more single minded in finding something, getting what we want (with the publication being often secondary), and moving onto another site.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/13/pew-news-online-print-newspapers/">Pew Research: More People Got Their News Online Yesterday Than From A Print Newspaper</a> (techcrunch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20100914-292190/Americans-spending-more-time-with-newsPew-survey">Americans spending more time with news &#8211; Pew survey</a> (newsinfo.inquirer.net)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=0028248f-d850-8b73-a4c1-302a62f4a5d2" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/is-the-internet-making-us-stupid-maybe-not-news-consumption-up-23.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey says Twitter users more likely to buy your stuff</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/survey-says-twitter-users-more-likely-to-buy-your-stuff.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=survey-says-twitter-users-more-likely-to-buy-your-stuff</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/survey-says-twitter-users-more-likely-to-buy-your-stuff.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month email marketing system Exact Target came out with a study showing that people on Twitter are more likely to spread the word about brands by posting on forums, commenting on blogs and posting ratings and reviews.   Now there&#8217;s a new Exact Target / Co-Tweet study (via Marketing Charts), showing that once they start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month email marketing system Exact Target came out with a study showing that people on<a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/08/why-should-brands-bother-with-twitter-this-table-says-why.html"> Twitter are more likely to spread the word</a> about brands by posting on forums, commenting on blogs and posting ratings and reviews.   Now there&#8217;s <a href="http://email.exacttarget.com/Company/Press/Detail/Default.aspx?id=4624">a new Exact Target / Co-Tweet</a> study (<a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/twitter-followers-most-brand-responsive-14186/exact-socnet-make-purchase-sept-2010jpg/">via Marketing Charts</a>), showing that once they start engaging with you, Twitter users are more likely to buy your products.</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/exact-socnet-make-purchase-sept-2010.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1920" title="exact-socnet-make-purchase-sept-2010" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/exact-socnet-make-purchase-sept-2010.jpg" alt="" width="514" height="345" /></a></p>
<p>Conducted among US Internet consumers, the study showed that 27% of subscribers to an email newsletter were more likely to purchase from a brand while 37% of Twittewr users were.</p>
<p>Meanwhile less than one in five Facebook brand fans (17%) said they were more likely to buy &#8211; a surprise considering that 49% disagreed with that statement (which is obviously not the same as saying that they were <em>less</em> likely to make a purchase).</p>
<p><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/exact-socnet-side-by-side-sept-2010.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1921" title="exact-socnet-side-by-side-sept-2010" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/exact-socnet-side-by-side-sept-2010.jpg" alt="" width="585" height="568" /></a></p>
<p>Exact Target has produced a handy chart showing that while Twitter has the lowest reach, it provides the greatest opportunities for customer acquisition.   However, it&#8217;s email subscribers who are the most interested in getting discounts, promotions or freebies.</p>
<p>Finally, it&#8217;s worth looking at who conducted the survey.</p>
<p>Exact Target is an email marketing system, and Co Tweet is a Twitter management tool&#8230;no Facebook app developers involved in the study then.   I&#8217;m not suggesting the data is wrong.</p>
<p>A lot of it is definitely interesting, and personally I am <a href="http://www.twitter.com/dirktherabbit">a big Twitter fan</a>, but you do wonder if some of the questions were skewed to produce a certain result.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20100908006535/en">Study Finds Customers Value Email, Facebook and Twitter as Collaborators, not Competitors</a> (eon.businesswire.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20100803006643/en">Study Finds Twitter Users Three Times More Likely to Impact Brands Online</a> (eon.businesswire.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/154052/2010/09/socialnetworks_mobiledevices.html?lsrc=rss_main">Smartphones, other mobile devices boost social networks</a> (macworld.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.socialtimes.com/2010/09/despite-fanfare-only-3-of-general-public-use-twitter-for-news/">Despite Fanfare, Only 3% of General Public Use Twitter for News</a> (socialtimes.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=221fa6d2-c4d6-8852-8ab9-f6764d768865" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/09/survey-says-twitter-users-more-likely-to-buy-your-stuff.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Impressions Count</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/first-impressions-count.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=first-impressions-count</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/first-impressions-count.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dirkthecow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colleges and Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Consumer Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study from the Journal of Consumer Research, first impressions really do count. Over time anyway. Academics Nicole Votolato Montgomery (College of William and Mary) and H. Rao Unnava (Ohio State University) gave test subjects two holiday scenarios.   One started well but ended badly, and the other started badly but ended well. They were then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-01/uocp-rtt012609.php">A study from</a> the Journal of Consumer Research, first impressions really do count.   Over time anyway.</p>
<p>Academics Nicole Votolato Montgomery (College of William and Mary) and H. Rao Unnava (Ohio State University) gave test subjects two holiday scenarios.   One started well but ended badly, and the other started badly but ended well.</p>
<p>They were then asked which one they&#8217;d most likely pay money for.   You&#8217;d imagine most people would say the holiday that ended well, and consumers who were asked about the experience immediately afterwards agreed.</p>
<p>However after a period of time consumers chose the scenario that started well as they couldn&#8217;t remember the final events as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;Consumers exhibit a preference for experiences that improve over time versus worsen over time when evaluations are assessed immediately, and they prefer the reverse when evaluations are assessed following a delay,&#8221; write the authors.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our findings suggest that marketers may engineer experiences to maximize customer enjoyment by improving the most memorable events. For long-term customer enjoyment, marketers should attempt to make consumers&#8217; initial experiences with a service or product very positive.&#8221;</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/15/journal-finds-that-consumers-prefer-vague-product-specs-to-utter/">Journal finds that consumers prefer vague product specs to utter ignorance</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5110687/consumers-choose-products-with-more-tech-specs">Consumers Choose Products With More Tech Specs [Study]</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.thisisherd.com/2009/01/more-internet-does-not-make-you-smarter.html">More Internet does not make you smarter</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=2b2d5826-d092-45a2-8f84-84d24623157d" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/first-impressions-count.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issue One &#124; Q1</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/issue-one-q1.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=issue-one-q1</link>
		<comments>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/issue-one-q1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liesdamnedlies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every week we track consumer and social media research and publish it on our blog ‘News From the Herd’. We wanted to start compiling some of the best stats we find in a quarterly newsletter, and as a result welcome to the first issue of ‘lies, damned lies and statistics.’ To download the latest issue, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every week we track consumer and social media research and publish it on our blog <a href="http://www.thisisherd.com/" target="_blank">‘News From the Herd’</a>. We wanted to start compiling some of the best stats we find in a quarterly newsletter, and as a result welcome to the first issue of ‘lies, damned lies and statistics.’</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/19.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4" title="Hello" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/19.jpg" alt="" width="385" height="271" /></a></p>
<p>To download the latest issue, use the link below (right-click and save as):</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/newsletter/LDLS_Q1.pdf" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-5 aligncenter" title="Right-click and 'save-as' to download Issue One" src="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/pdf-logo.jpg" alt="" width="76" height="76" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/newsletter/LDLS_Q1.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Issue One | Q1</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/01/issue-one-q1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

