<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 80%+ Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The State of Google+: Observations Two Months After Launch &#171; GhazaliRidzwan.com</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-6850</link>
		<dc:creator>The State of Google+: Observations Two Months After Launch &#171; GhazaliRidzwan.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-6850</guid>
		<description>[...] To have a large percentage of users be classified as inactive is not unique to Google+. Other networks experience a similar fate. For example, research indicates that as many as 80 percent of Twitter users are inactive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To have a large percentage of users be classified as inactive is not unique to Google+. Other networks experience a similar fate. For example, research indicates that as many as 80 percent of Twitter users are inactive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The rise of Instagram, some stats</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-6321</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The rise of Instagram, some stats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-6321</guid>
		<description>[...] positions it as a significantly stronger retention rate than Twitter.   Remember that RJ Metrics previously estimated Twitter&#8217;s monthly churn rate to be in the region of 83% (and in a previous post I reckoned [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] positions it as a significantly stronger retention rate than Twitter.   Remember that RJ Metrics previously estimated Twitter&#8217;s monthly churn rate to be in the region of 83% (and in a previous post I reckoned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Twitter&#8217;s real user base around 20 million?</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Twitter&#8217;s real user base around 20 million?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 08:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-5609</guid>
		<description>[...] year RJ Metrics figured out that Twitter&#8217;s rate of churn was 83% &#8211; or rather this was the % of accounts that had seen no activity for a month, a pretty good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year RJ Metrics figured out that Twitter&#8217;s rate of churn was 83% &#8211; or rather this was the % of accounts that had seen no activity for a month, a pretty good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter é o novo Second Life? &#124; Midiatismo &#124; Marketing Digital e Comunicação Digital</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5090</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter é o novo Second Life? &#124; Midiatismo &#124; Marketing Digital e Comunicação Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-5090</guid>
		<description>[...] que vai acontecer com ele, ainda mais se tratando de algo tão imprevisível como uma mídia social.FONTE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] que vai acontecer com ele, ainda mais se tratando de algo tão imprevisível como uma mídia social.FONTE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter é o novo Second Life? &#171; Midiatismo</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter é o novo Second Life? &#171; Midiatismo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>[...] FONTE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FONTE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>[...] in January, RJ Metrics produced a report saying that only 17% of Twitter accounts had sent a single tweet over the month, which would put [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in January, RJ Metrics produced a report saying that only 17% of Twitter accounts had sent a single tweet over the month, which would put [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Morning Teanotes #5</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Morning Teanotes #5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>[...] 80% van de Twitteraccounts inactief: &#8220;Twitter’s actual user base is small compared to the number of registrations&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 80% van de Twitteraccounts inactief: &#8220;Twitter’s actual user base is small compared to the number of registrations&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australians the most sociable online</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Australians the most sociable online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>[...] that again confirms the dominance of Facebook as being for social media what Google is for search.  The other day I mentioned a Reuters article questioning whether Facebook was achieving technological &#8216;lock-in&#8217;, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that again confirms the dominance of Facebook as being for social media what Google is for search.  The other day I mentioned a Reuters article questioning whether Facebook was achieving technological &#8216;lock-in&#8217;, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for 80%+ Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed [liesdamnedliesstatistics.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for 80%+ Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed [liesdamnedliesstatistics.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 07:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>[...] 80%+ Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed  liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  Back in April there were comparisons of Twitter = the new Second Life (i.e the hyped network of 2009) when Nielsen said that 60% of users lost interest after registering, leaving their accounts dormant. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 80%+ Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed  liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Back in April there were comparisons of Twitter = the new Second Life (i.e the hyped network of 2009) when Nielsen said that 60% of users lost interest after registering, leaving their accounts dormant. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2010/01/80-twitter-accounts-inactive-but-core-users-more-committed.html/comment-page-1#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/?p=1325#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by dirktherabbit: (blog post) 80%  Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed http://is.gd/7h6yk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by dirktherabbit: (blog post) 80%  Twitter accounts inactive, but core users more committed <a href="http://is.gd/7h6yk.." rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/7h6yk..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

