<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The results are clear: Social media chatter drives brand searches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html</link>
	<description>Consumer behaviour, social media and advertising stats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Proof that online content creation works</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html/comment-page-1#comment-7511</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Proof that online content creation works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html#comment-7511</guid>
		<description>[...] Secondly , there is no obvious button to share the content they&#8217;ve spent money creating.   Content + Search is a good approach.   Content + Social + Search is better. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Secondly , there is no obvious button to share the content they&#8217;ve spent money creating.   Content + Search is a good approach.   Content + Social + Search is better. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The top three spots on Google get 58% of clicks</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html/comment-page-1#comment-5909</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The top three spots on Google get 58% of clicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html#comment-5909</guid>
		<description>[...] as I work for a social media agency, I am a big believer in SEO + social working together.    For example, Comscore has shown that 50% of &#8216;social media exposed&#8217; surfers search for product terms every day compared to 33% of non-exposed surfers.    In other words, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I work for a social media agency, I am a big believer in SEO + social working together.    For example, Comscore has shown that 50% of &#8216;social media exposed&#8217; surfers search for product terms every day compared to 33% of non-exposed surfers.    In other words, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; With activity down 16%, is the age of search slowly drawing to a close?</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html/comment-page-1#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; With activity down 16%, is the age of search slowly drawing to a close?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>[...] year &#8211; that search and social media campaigns now need to work very much in tandem, with a paid search campaign supported by social activity being 2.23x more effective than if conducted on its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year &#8211; that search and social media campaigns now need to work very much in tandem, with a paid search campaign supported by social activity being 2.23x more effective than if conducted on its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: European marketers to up online spend, but click throughs still poor</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html/comment-page-1#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>European marketers to up online spend, but click throughs still poor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>[...] at the same time Comscore has results out showing that when combined with a social engagement, people are more than twice as likely to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the same time Comscore has results out showing that when combined with a social engagement, people are more than twice as likely to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Half of us search for brands after seeing them on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html/comment-page-1#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Half of us search for brands after seeing them on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liesdamnedliesstatistics.com/2009/10/the-results-are-clear-social-media-chatter-drives-brand-searches.html#comment-989</guid>
		<description>[...] earlier study by Comscore similarly showed that people exposed to brand chatter on social media were significantly more likely both to search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] earlier study by Comscore similarly showed that people exposed to brand chatter on social media were significantly more likely both to search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

