FIFA lawyer’s letter a godsend for low fares airline

by dirktherabbit on March 12, 2010

South African blogger marklives points us to something that’s going on at the moment in South Africa.   Like the IOC, FIFA is known to come down hard on any brand making even the slightest unofficial reference to their event.

SA low fares airline Kulula.com did exactly that, producing an ad proclaiming that they were the “unofficial national carrier of the you know what.“   Despite not actually mentioning the word ‘World Cup’, FIFA apparently took umbrage at the use of a stadium image and soccer balls.

Never mind…FIFA has probably done Kulula a huge favour.    The airline has been cheerfully talking about it on Twitter, and as marklives says, thanks to people forwarding it (and FIFA’s reaction) around on blogs and Twitter, the joke will probably end up being on FIFA boss Sepp Blatter.

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 0 comments }

Facebook, Twitter use takes off on mobiles

by dirktherabbit on March 9, 2010

The other day I posted about Nielsen’s stats showing that the over 25s (and over 35s in particular) are the most active on mobile social networks, as opposed to teens.   The other giant metrics firm, Comscore (via Marketing Charts), has now produced figures about the growth of mobile social networking in general.

Looking at the US, Comscore worked out that access to Facebook via mobiles grew by 112% over the past year, while mobile Twitter access went up 347%.

At the same time, MySpace continues to decline on mobiles as well as on the Web, with 7% less users accessing it via their mobile devices.


Unsurprisingly, the growth in mobile social networking comes from smartphone users - hence the over 35s that Nielsen talked about who are both more likely to be able to afford one and also get one via their jobs.    30.8% of smartphone users accessed mobile social networks, compared to just 6.8% of more run of the mill ‘feature phone’ users.

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 0 comments }

Royal Pingdom, the people who the other month produced a chart showing how social media is female dominated, has released another study.   This time they looked at the age distribution across social network sites in the US. (Via Matthew Gain)

In line with other studies over the past eighteen months, it shows that social media is the preserve of Web users aged 25+ with 62% being aged 25-54 and only 9% being 18-24.    In terms of age distribution across the various sites, it’s perhaps no surprise that LinkedIn had a reasonably older profile at one end of the scale and Bebo (a brand you don’t hear people talking about a lot anymore) had 40%+ of its audience aged under 17.

Royal Pingdom lists Twitter’s average age as 39, and as always for every stat it’s possible to produce another one that can give you a slightly different interpretation.   So the other week Silicon Alley Insider produced this chart from Comscore showing that the under 24s now account for 30% of Twitter users, up from 20% at the end of 2008.

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 2 comments }

Less than 4/10 Americans rely purely on offline media

by dirktherabbit on March 6, 2010

Kirk LaPointe’s media blog points us towards this report by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which takes a look at news consumption in the United States.

Bearing in mind that the whole death of print trend is arguably more advanced in the US than in the UK or Australia, it’s worth a look.   Key points:

  • The young are least likely to be regular news consumers.  35% of 18-29 year olds follow the news all or most of the time.   For people aged 65+ that rises to 70%
  • However, it’s impossible to blank out the news completely and 99% of Americans do admit to getting news, at least casually in some shape or form.   Local (78%) and national (73%) TV leads, followed by the Internet (61%).   By contrast, 50% read a local paper, 54% listen to the radio, while 17% read a ‘national’ newspaper (the latter stat would be different in say the UK, due to the stronger position of national newspapers)
  • News is also consumed across several channels simultaneously, 46% of Americans use between four of the six news platforms


The report also looks at Internet news consumption in more detail.    Less than four in ten (38%) Americans rely solely on news from offline sources, the majority (59%) rely on both on and offline sources, while 2% only get their news online.   It’s worth remembering however that ‘offline’ includes TV and radio as well as print.

Tying into some of the stats mentioned above, the research found that online news consumers were by and large both better educated and younger than the average.    So, the median age of all news consumers was 58, but for people who get their news online it was 40.

Finally, and this is a stat we mentioned in the recent ‘Rabbit Feed’ (our weekly newsletter over at Rabbit), news is now much more of a social phenomenon.   Three quarters (75%) of adults that get their news online say they get it forwarded to them through email or social media.

And it works in a virtuous circle.   News gets forwarded online via social media from people who at the same time deepen their engagement with the news.  97% of American social network users read the news online, and 51% of that 97% get news forwarded onto them via friends on places like Facebook on a typical day.

Strengthening the role of Twitter as a network that has influence and importance beyond its 10-15 million worldwide active user base, it’s also worth noting that the study found that 99% of Twitter users are online news consumers.

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 1 comment }

There’s a war on - pull the ads!

by dirktherabbit on March 6, 2010

A study published by two academics from Oregon State University and Eastern Washington University (via Science Daily) found that when people watch ‘graphic’ and ‘intense’ war news on TV, they are less likely to remember the ads that follow.

Keven Malkewitz and Damon Aiken showed 396 students five minutes of war news from Iraq followed by two 30 second ad spots.   The cycle was then repeated again for the students’ viewing pleasure - more war footage and then more ads.   The ads had all been aired during US nightly news broadcasts and featured large brand names.

If the news items featured ’strong intensity’ the students were less likely to remember the ads.   The definition of intensity meant words such as ’suicide’ and ‘explosive’ being used, along with shock images of bodies and amputees.

A previous study confirms much the same - at the end of 2008 Experian found that news programmes, magazines or websites were becoming less effective in terms of getting brand or ad messages across, with consumers simply not being in the ‘buy’ frame of mind when there’s a constant drum beat of doom being thrown at them.

Though in Experian’s study, news media scored highly on ’social interaction’ (you talk about what you see), it didn’t provide all important ‘time out’ factor.  As a result, 28% of consumers were influenced by ad messages they saw in the news media, compared to 40% for other media.   In other words, if there’s a war or global recession on, put those remaining marketing pounds or dollars into entertainment or lifestyle media!

There is a twist to the study done by Keven Malkewitz and Damon Aiken though: When viewers were shown war news defined as ‘less intense’ (just a bit of shooting here and there?), people who were war supporters often did remember the ads, with anti war viewers still not remembering them.

Guess for some brands, those ad buys on Fox News really is money well spent after all.

Image - Dunechaser

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 0 comments }

Despite a previous Ofcom report showing that for (UK) 16-24 year olds the mobile phone was the second most essential piece of media behind the TV and ahead of the PC, metrics firm Nielsen says that it’s really people aged 25+, and in particular 35+, who are most likely to be going online via their mobiles.


36% of mobile social network use is done by 35-54 year olds, with 34% being done by 25-34 year olds.   By comparison, 18-24 year olds only account for 16%.   One reason for this could in fact be that smartphones are still fairly expensive and out of the reach of many 18 year olds.   And a lot of people aged 30+ will be issued a blackberry or other smartphone as part of their jobs.

On the Web as a whole, women tend to dominate in social media.   Last year Rapleaf did a study all about women having more friends on social networks than men, while Royal Pingdom looked at 19 sites and found that 53% of users were female.   Nielsen says that this trend is replicated on mobiles - 55% of users are women while 45% are men.


Are mobile marketers getting it wrong?   Rather than trying to aim their mobile campaigns at 19 year old students, should they be turning their sights to 35 year old female business executives?

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 1 comment }

Forget the 80/20 principle, with Twitter it is 79/7

by dirktherabbit on February 25, 2010

A well known rule of thumb in business is the so-called Pareto principle (or the 80/20 rule) that 20% of participants will account for 80% of the activity.   Metrics firm Nielsen decided to test out if the same applies to Twitter - do 20% of tweeple account for 80% of what takes place on Twitter.

The answer is no.   At least in the UK, an even smaller number - 7% - account for 79% of Twitter activity.

Nielsen found that ‘light’ users (less than 2 minutes per month, actually broken across 30 days that is pretty much zero) account for 67% of the audience, medium users (22 mins per month, so still less than a minute a day) account for 26%, while heavy users (1hr+ a month) account for 7% of UK tweeple.

Nielsen’s stats confirm previous ones by Canadian research firm Sysomos, which showed that there is a group of 5% of Twitter power users who are responsible for 75% of Twitter activity.

Similarly, in January, RJ Metrics produced a report saying that only 17% of Twitter accounts had sent a single tweet over the month, which would put Twitter’s ‘real’ user base at around 10-15 million worldwide (with perhaps 700-900k in the UK) as opposed to the 75 million registered users.

Again, the fact that there are probably less than a million people in the UK making habitual use of Twitter shouldn’t matter.   News often breaks on Twitter and, due to the large proportion of bloggers and journalists that listen in on the network, moves elsewhere.

As the founder of spoof political website mydavidcameron.com (lampooning ads featuring the UK Conservative Party leader) found, chatter about his website started on Twitter and then quickly moved on from there to Facebook and finally to the media at large.

Finally, it’s also worth bearing in mind Nielsen’s observations that other networks similarly have a core of power users who dominate.  Three percent (3%) of MySpace visitors account for 63% of time spent on the site while 5% of LinkedIn visitors account for 50% of LinkedIn activity.   A challenge for marketers targeting those networks is obviously to zero in on, and find out who those three or five percent are.

Linking in with its role as a network, which according to Reuters is rapidly gaining ‘tech lock in’, Facebook however has a higher participation rate -  52% of users account for almost everything (98%) that goes on.

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 3 comments }

A feature in Campaign asks the question of whether clients need specialist social media agencies. Though that’s not what we call Rabbit (we do a lot more than social media outreach), we’re aware that we’re often grouped in that ‘pot’, so we thought we’d respond.

Sure, we have a vested interest, but actually our take is that clients don’t need specialist shops per se. What they do need is specialists who know what they are talking about and have some first hand experience of the tools they recommend.

And at the moment at least, the latest breed of social media and digital agencies just happens to be where a lot of these specialists are to be found and where a lot of the, what you might call skills development, takes place.

It’s an open secret that given varying levels of client education in what’s still quite a new space, that it’s been possible for just about anyone to set themselves up as an ‘expert’ and roll out a presentation containing a few buzz-words.

Social media marketing isn’t just ‘online PR’
As a result, last year blogger (and now a senior executive at Edelman in the States) David Armano questioned whether as he put it, social media practitioners should “eat their own dog food ” - this followed a number of organisations in the US appointing people to social media positions who didn’t actually have any kind of significant track record.

That might have worked a year ago, but clients are increasingly buying into the idea that social media marketing isn’t simply ‘online PR’ (transferring offline habits online). Instead what is it?

1 - It’s being able to come up with a winning idea and concept, that definitely hasn’t changed. The other week, the creator of spoof website mydavidcameron.com, in a post on the five lessons you can learn from his site, admitted that number one was the fact that he had a winning idea - everything else stemmed from that.

2 - It’s having an understanding of how whatever you do can translate throughout the rest of the marketing mix, rather than sitting in a digital silo.

3 - It’s having an appreciation of how things evolve online, where the gap between items being talked about on social networks and hitting the mainstream media can be as little as four hours.

4 - It’s having an understanding of metrics. Part of our job is a numbers and planning one, and being able to make sense of the various sentiment and influence analysis tools out there.

5 - But finally, it is knowing about the right tools to use to get the job done, and there nothing beats first hand experience.

Just Google the team

Recently, a client googled both fellow-Rabbit Louise and myself as individuals to see if we had any kind of online footprint. Fortunately we do, and we shouldn’t really be in the space if we don’t.

That seems like good practice going forward. If an agency comes up and presents ’social media’ or any kind of digital strategy, google the individual team members just you would a job candidate. What do you find and what have they done? Do they use whatever they are recommending in a personal capacity, and do they also interact with their peers online?

In response to David’s post last year, one of the few comments in disagreement pointed out that media planners don’t always have experience of using the products they work for. A better analogy would be this - would you allow someone who doesn’t actually watch much TV to advise you on your TV strategy?

Image - Mai Le

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 6 comments }

Is Twitter getting younger?

by dirktherabbit on February 16, 2010

This fascinating chart from Silicon Alley Insider (via social media optimization), goes through the current Twitter demographics.    With Twitter traditionally having been seen as the preserve of the over 25s or even over 30s, it’s interesting to see that the highest rate of growth comes from the under 24s.

At the end of 2009, tweeple 24 and under accounted for 30%, up from 20%  at the end of 2008.   A sign that it might slowly be broadening its appeal from 30 something bloggers and early adopters?

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 2 comments }

89% of journalists use blogs to research stories

by dirktherabbit on February 15, 2010

‘Where do stories come from?’ asks an article on Media Post.   While previous research showed that online media only accounts for 4% of what you might call ‘new news’, journalists definitely do use it to supplement and build on stories and find out additional information.

A study by George Washington University and Cision found that 89% of journalists turn to blogs for research, 65% to social media sites like Facebook, 52% to Twitter.   And Wikipedia?  Over 6/10 (61%) consult it.


Overall 55% of journalists thought that social media was either somewhat or very important.   However, at the same time 84% said it was ’slightly less’ or ‘much less’ reliable than traditional media.

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 1 comment }